Genesis Microchip Inc. (GNSS) - Pixelworks, Inc. (PXLW)

Announced: March 17, 2003 (Press Release)
Expected Close: Q3 2003
Termination Date:September 17, 2003 / November 17, 2003
Terms: Pixelworks will issue 2.3366 shares of Pixelworks
common stock for each outstanding share of Genesis Microchip
common stock and will issue Pixelworks stock options for
Genesis stock options based on the same exchange ratio.


Total Value: $600m
Website(s): GNSS & PXLW
Industry: Semiconductor

Recent Updates GNSS-PXLW Research Front Page




Filings, Reviews & Approvals

Pending

Hart Scott Rodino

  • June 23, 2003 - Second Request
  • Mayy 23, 2003 - Filed

SEC

Shareholder Approvals

 

GNSS

PXLW

SH Date TBA TBA
Record Date May 21, 2003 May 21, 2003
Proxy Mailed TBA TBA

Completed

Top



Updates

July 7, 2003 (9:10a)- Preliminary Proxy Statement Filed

Shareholder Meeting Details

 

GNSS

PXLW

SH Date TBA TBA
Record Date May 21, 2003 May 21, 2003
Proxy Mailed TBA TBA

Termination Date

September 17, 2003 / November 17, 2003

Regulatory Matters

HSR
On June 23, 2003, the Federal Trade Commission requested additional information and documentary material in connection with its review of the proposed merger. The Federal Trade Commission request will result in an extension of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. Pixelworks and Genesis Microchip plan to respond as promptly as possible to the Federal Trade Commission request.

Other
In addition, we may be required to make certain filings or seek certain approvals from other foreign jurisdictions to be determined. The Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice frequently scrutinize the legality of transactions such as the merger under the antitrust laws. At any time before or after the completion of the merger, the Federal Trade Commission or the Department of Justice could take a variety of actions under the antitrust laws, including seeking to prevent the merger or seeking the divestiture of substantial assets of Pixelworks or Genesis Microchip. In addition, certain private parties as well as state attorneys general and other antitrust authorities may challenge the merger under United States or foreign antitrust laws. We intend to make any applicable foreign such filings if we determine that they are required.

June 24, 2003 (8:55a)- HSR Second Request Issued

The companies have announced that the FTC has issued a second request under HSR. A joint company press release states the following:

"The FTC request will result in an extension of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976. Genesis Microchip and Pixelworks plan to respond as promptly as possible to the FTC request."

Previous analysis of this combination is available in this March 19 postingand this update posting. The transaction remains expected to obtain FTC approval, without much difficulty, in the next six to eight weeks.

June 16, 2003 (9:00a)- Preliminary Proxy Statement Filed

Shareholder Meeting Details

 

GNSS

PXLW

SH Date TBA TBA
Record Date May 21, 2003 May 21, 2003
Proxy Mailed TBA TBA

Termination Date

September 17, 2003 / November 17, 2003

Regulatory Matters

HSR
Under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, as amended, the merger may not be consummated unless certain filings are submitted to the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice and certain waiting period requirements are satisfied. We filed the notification and report forms required under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act with the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice on (TBA) 2003. In addition, we may be required to make certain filings or seek certain approvals from other foreign jurisdictions to be determined. The Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice frequently scrutinize the legality of transactions such as the merger under the antitrust laws.

Other
We intend to make any applicable foreign such filings if we determine that they are required.

May 19, 2003 (12:30p) - Status Report

Comments were received from the SEC early last week, and GNSS characterizes the questions as "fairly in-depth, but not onerous." The companies hope to address the comments and re-file the proxy statement before the end of May, but there is clearly a chance this may not occur. Furthermore, based on the nature of the comments, GNSS believes at least one more comment/response cycle will be necessary in order to obtain SEC approval. Therefore, the shareholder meeting are not likely to be scheduled until mid/late-July, 2003, at the earliest.

Unfortunately, the companies continue to refuse to provide HSR details at this point. Presumably, the HSR filing date will be dropped into the next revised proxy.

April 20, 2003 (8:35a)- Preliminary Proxy Statment Filed

Shareholder Meeting Details

 

GNSS

PXLW

SH Date TBA TBA
Record Date TBA TBA
Proxy Mailed TBA TBA

Termination Date

September 17, 2003 / November 17, 2003

Regulatory Matters

HSR
We filed the notification and report forms required under the Hart-Scott Rodino Act with the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice on · (TBA), 2003. In addition, we may be required to make certain filings or seek certain approvals from other foreign jurisdictions to be determined. The Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice frequently scrutinize the legality of transactions such as the merger under the antitrust laws. At any time before or after the completion of the merger, the Federal Trade Commission or the Department of Justice could take a variety of actions under the antitrust laws, including seeking to prevent the merger or seeking the divestiture of substantial assets of Pixelworks or Genesis Microchip.

Other
In addition, certain private parties as well as state attorneys general and other antitrust authorities may challenge the merger under United States or foreign antitrust laws. We intend to make any applicable foreign such filings if we determine that they are required.

April 7, 2003 (2:30p) - Status Report

Unfortunately, the companies have decided to withhold all details regarding the various regulatory matters in this transaction. The only guidance PXLW will provide at this time is that the HSR notification has not been submitted as of yet, and will be filed at approximately the same time as the initial proxy statement. A projection for the first proxy filing is not being provided by either company.

As the deal was announced on March 17, it is reasonably safe to assume that the proxy statement is nearing completion, and should be filed within the next two weeks.

March 19, 2003 (9:15a) - Additional Research Analysis

Subsequent research into this transaction has yielded a much more optimistic outlook than the original assessment. While the relative complexity of the products involved and the high market shares continue to raise the possibility of some FTC interest, it now appears the IC market for Liquid Crystal Display / Flat Panel Display products is much more diverse and competitive than originally believed.

First, a conversation with one industry expert raised the "Beer vs. Champagne" analogy for this transaction. In short, the display industry in general considers PXLW's products as geared towards high-end or 'champagne' display screens, such as new-generation televisions (Plasma/HDTV), hand-held computers, cell phones, projectors, etc. GNSS' IC's, on the other hand, are used primarily in less advanced 'beer' products such as flat panel monitors and flat panel digital televisions. In other words, the general use for the companies IC's is the same, but the types of products in which the IC function are as different as...beer and champagne.

Second, it is abundantly clear that other players in the broad FPD industry, such as Philips, STM, Macronix, and others (including in-house manufacturers such as Sony), have the capability to maintain sufficient competition in both the high-end and low-end markets regardless of this combination. Most market share data that is publicly available at this time is essentially obsolete as the industry has evolved rapidly over the last two years due to increased demand for high-end FPD products. The companies have, by all accounts, seen their market shares decline rapidly because of this trend, and the corresponding introduction of improved IC products offered by the above-mentioned competitors, as well as a significant number of Asian competitors.

Third, there has been virtually no indication from the numerous trade publications that this combination presents any competitive problems. The semiconductor industry in one of the most highly covered and analyzed segments out there, and not one article has yet to mention this deal as anything other than an expected development. In fact, several publications are quick to point out that this combination is actually illogical due to the different end uses of the companies' respective products. If there were antitrust problems here, it's inconceivable that every such publication would fail to raise the point.

In sum, there is far more evidence suggesting this deal will not draw FTC interest at this time. The current FTC has shown some slowness in understanding complex technologies and quickly evolving markets, so the possibility of a second request must be acknowledged. However, if HSR consent is not granted in 30 days or less, a notification re-filing seems much more likely than a full second request, at this time. The chances of a second request are therefore now perceived at less than 10% -- perhaps closer to 5%, and the chances of an HSR re-filing are perceived at only slightly higher.

March 18, 2003 (8:20a) - "Genesis Microchip to Buy Pixelworks"

Abstracted from a San Jose Mercury News article:

"As flat-panel display prices come down, mounting competition from Taiwanese companies threatens to erode Genesis Microchip's profits and market share -- and that competition casts a cloud over the new company.

"Genesis investors oppose the agreement because many bought the stock expecting it to rise past $20 and don't believe the deal will boost sales, said CE Unterberg Towbin analyst Kalpesh Kapadia. Genesis chose to be bought because it fears losing sales to rivals including STMicroelectronics, he said.

"The Pixelworks purchase suggests Genesis will stick to its business of making the standard semiconductors that power flat-panel computer displays, rather than focusing more on other promising technology in its portfolio. Those flat-panel chips account for at least 80 percent of Genesis sales, and the company has roughly 65 percent market share in that business said Steve Allen, analyst with Sterling Financial Investment Group.

"'It's a cutthroat business, and most of the cutthroat companies are based in Taiwan,' Allen said. He said that right now, Genesis can cut costs faster than chip prices drop, maintaining profits -- but by the end of 2003, profits will shrink. 'If you ask me what they should have done, is drop the LCD monitor business and focus on consumer television.'

"Specifically, Allen said, Genesis has a unit called Faroudja Laboratories that has a lot of promise. Faroudja has a patented analog technology that allows television images to appear more clearly that could satisfy consumer demand for sharper TV ahead of high-definition channels. 'They don't need Pixelworks for that,' he said."

March 17, 2003 (1:10p) - Misc. Article Excerpts

2001 eSignal article:

"The combined Genesis-Sage could enjoy 65 percent or greater market share in flat-panel chips, according to a CIBC World Markets report. National Semiconductor (NSM) also makes circuits for flat panels. Pixelworks' piece of the market for flat-panel chips is very small, the fund manager concedes. Romero, using Multex.com earnings estimates, has Genesis shares selling for a 2002 price-earnings multiple of 65 or so, with 100 percent revenue growth in the next year, thanks to the Sage purchase. No bargain there, though. The shares have risen more than 150 percent from their October lows.

"Tiny Pixelworks, meanwhile, should increase sales by 40 percent next year, Romero says. Pixelworks' market capitalization of $700 million is half that of Genesis. 'It really does appear cheap,' says Romero, who owns the shares. 'Pixelworks also has stronger gross margins (a five-year average 65 percent versus 55 percent at Genesis) and trades at almost half the price-sales ratio of Genesis,' Romero said Monday morning. 'Regardless of whom you own, the market is expected to continue its torrid growth well into the next couple of years. The only wild card is the growth rate for these companies.'"

2000 SiliconIndia article

"After demonstrating its proof of concept, Sage launched a project to manufacture an IC-based controller for FPDs. But there was a hitch: the factory that Sage was using to manufacture ICs developed technical snags, as a result of which Sage lost six months. To recover the lost time, the company began work on its second-generation IC-based product, the Cheetah II. In the meanwhile, the production had to be migrated elsewhere, and by the time the first generation product was out in the market, competitor PixelWorks had introduced a slightly superior product. Though Sage had successfully manufactured and introduced a product, it was not yet a market winner. To gain its market position, the company looked to feedback from its customers, who were mostly Japanese companies, trendsetters of the FPD market. Their views and requests were incorporated in the design of the Cheetah II, that was introduced in June 1998 and grabbed a 20 percent market share for Sage.

"The success of Cheetah II has established Sage in the second position in the market. The company aims to be a top player by the end of this year by continuing to simplify monitor circuit design an area in which it has already pioneered several features and innovations. Its goal is to design products that would result in an ideal monitor - one without switches and buttons, with true plug-and-play features.

" Sage currently focuses on FPDs that use liquid crystal display (LCD), though its technology can drive any type of FPD. Several new technologies for FPDs are coming up that may result in cheaper and larger screens not just for computer monitors but for large TVs used in home theater systems as well. FPDs are also ideal for high definition televisions (HDTV). Sage is watching these emerging trends and is developing chips to address these markets. 'The way we see it, flat panels are the future displays. Five years from now these will be the predominant displays,' says Reddy. Until then, PCs will have to be sold separately."

March 17, 2003 (11:30a) - Initial Research Analysis

This transaction looks like a very strong candidate to end the long semiconductor streak of quick HSR clearances. Every indication to this point suggests the combined markets shares, in at least one very complex technology segment, are sufficient to anticipate a second request. Furthermore, most industry reports (prior to today's announcement) very clearly show one of the companies as a dominant player, and the other a competitor, in niche segments. One example is this April 2002 Stanford Resources article which notes the following:

"Such companies as Genesis Microchip, Sage (now a part of Genesis), Macronix, and Trumpion (the last two are from Taiwan) have historically held the largest shares of this market. Genesis has dominated the business with an approximate 60% share, and its share has risen to 70% following its acquisition of Sage. Profit margins have been extraordinarily high for the leaders. For example, Genesis reported $12 million in profit on $49.8 million in revenue for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2001.

"It appears that the brisk growth rates and high profiles of the LCD monitor market have attracted many competitors in display electronics in a short duration. The list now includes (in addition to the companies listed above): Pixelworks, Philips, STMicroelectronics, Media Reality Technologies, Topro Technology, Myson-Century Technology, ED Tech, Integrated Technology Express, and Weltrend Semiconductor. Not surprisingly, prices are responding to this competition.

GNSS' current 'dominant' position in certain niches combined with PXLW's modest position should be enough to generate a second request -- especially when considering the technologies involved and the FTC's still light case load.

On the positive side, there does appear to be (as noted above) a number of new entrants into the field, some of which -- specifically Philips and STM -- obviously have the ability to gain more market share if motivated.

As additional research is conducted, the initial projections is for a second request, or at least and HSR re-filing), followed by a relatively brief second request review period of approximately two to three months. It is unclear at this stage is divestitures will be necessary, but at first glance this does not seem highly likely.

March 17, 2003 (10:40a) - Press Release Highlights

"Genesis Microchip Inc. (Nasdaq: GNSS) and Pixelworks, Inc. (Nasdaq: PXLW), announced today the execution of a definitive merger agreement. The new company, to be called Genesis Pixelworks, is positioned to become a leading provider of system-on-a-chip ICs for the rapidly growing display and consumer electronics industries. The companies are combining their respective technical and financial resources to accelerate the development of new, innovative technologies and products that customers require in these dynamic industries. Upon the closing and successful integration of the transaction, Genesis Microchip and Pixelworks believe that the combined company will be able to offer a broad line of the industry’s best display controller solutions to the manufacturers of LCD monitors, televisions, and multimedia projectors.

"Subject to shareholder approvals and other customary closing conditions, the transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of calendar 2003.

"Genesis Microchip Inc. (Nasdaq: GNSS) is a leading provider of image processing systems enabling superior picture quality for a variety of consumer and PC-display products. Featuring Genesis Display Perfection(TM) technologies and Emmy-award winning Faroudja® video technology, Genesis system-on-a-chip solutions are used worldwide by display manufacturers to produce visibly better images across a broad set of devices including flat-panel displays, digital TVs, digital CRTs, projectors and DVD players. The Genesis technology portfolio features 135 patents, including analog and mixed signal system-on-a-chip design, DCDi(TM) by Faroudja deinterlacing, TrueLife(TM) video enhancement and IntelliComb(TM) video decoding.

"Pixelworks, headquartered in Tualatin, Oregon, is a leading provider of system-on-a-chip ICs for the advanced display market. Pixelworks' solutions process and optimize video, computer graphics and Web information for display on a wide variety of devices used in business and consumer markets, including flat-panel monitors, digital televisions and multimedia projectors."

Top